Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176852 (MAD)

VIMALRAJ v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/33667/2025 · 2025-12-09

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.33667 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 09.12.2025 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.33667 of 2025 --- Vimalraj, S/o Murugesan .. Petitioner Vs. State, Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Tiruppur Central Police Station, Tiruppur District. (Crime No.258 of 2025) .. Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in pending trial in C.C.No.1065 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruppur. For petitioner : M/s.K.Govi Ganesan For respondent: M/s.A.Gopinath, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.05.2025 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 303(2) of BNS Act, 2023 in C.C.No. 1065 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruppur. Page No. 1 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.33667 of 2025 2.The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner herein involved in stealing of a two wheeler, which was subsequently used for chain snatching. A complaint was lodged, and the petitioner was arrested on May 27, 2025. 3.The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody from 27.05.2025 and now the case is pending for trial and the property has also recovered and he prays to grant bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, reiterated the prosecution case and submits that the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody and the petitioner also used the two wheeler for chain snatching and the petitioner is having 8 previous cases, out of which, four robbery cases and four chain snatching cases. Therefore, he strongly opposed for grant bail to the petitioner. 5.I have also gone through the FIR and other relevant materials, including the list of 8 previous cases, out of which, four cases are related to robbery and theft, including chain snatching. Hence, if bail is granted to the petitioner, he would likely in similar offences in future, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Page No. 2 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.33667 of 2025 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 09.12.2025 msm To 1. The Inspector of Police, Tiruppur Central Police Station, Tiruppur District. (Crime No.258 of 2025). 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 3. The Judicial Magistrate-II, Tiruppur. 4. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore. Page No. 3 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.33667 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR, J msm Crl.O.P.No.33667 of 2025 09.12.2025 Page No. 4 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis