HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6960 of 2025 Court No. - 22 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sanjeev Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Present petition has been filed for the following relief: "To direct the opposite party No. 1 to decide the mutation proceeding U/S 34 Revenue Code Act 2006 in Case No. T202404680702548 namely "Ram Asare Vs. Jai Prakash Soni" village Pahadpur Raipatti, Pargana Aldeymau, District Sultanpur, in which the mutation application is pending since long, expeditiously preferable within a stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that application u/s 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (in short 'the Code, 2006'), has been pending since 2024. Therefore, direction may be issued to decide the same, expeditiously. 4. Considering the aforesaid submission and taking into account the order sheet of the present case, present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.1 to decide the Case No. T202404680702548, u/s 34 of the Code, 2006, as expeditiously as possible, in light of the judgement of this court in Daya Shankar vs. State of U.P. and 4 others reported in 2023 (6) ADJ 181, dated 19.05.2023. December 3, 2025 S.C. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Nayak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Virendra .....Petitioner(s) Naib Tehsildar Diyara, Tehsil Jaisinghpur, Sultanpur And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench