Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176850 (ALL)

SMT. RAJ PATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.EDU.BASICCIVIL SECTT.LKO. and ORS.

WRIA/23411/2016 · 2025-12-11

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 23411 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State and Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, counsel for respondent no. 3 are present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 11, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Nigam, Achhey Lal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Neeraj Chaurasiya (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt. Raj Pati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Edu.Basiccivil Sectt.Lko. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench