1 2025:CGHC:18218 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1929 of 2025 1 - Chanchal Women Self Help Group Through President Smt. Eti Devi W/o Shri Dukhharan Mishra Aged About 32 Years, President Of Chanchal Women Self Help Group R/o Ward No. 1 Nagarpalika Parishad - Balrampur, Block- Balrampur Distt- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supply Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur Distt- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector- Balrampur Distt- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 3 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Balrampur Distt- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar, Balrampur, Distt- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 5 - The Block Education Officer Balrampur, Distt- Balrampur- Ramaunjganj (C.G.) 6 - President Of Tulsi Women Self Help Group- Balrampur R/o Ward No. 5, Nagarpalika Parishad - Balrampur, P.S And Tahsil- Balrampur, Distt- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Shri A.N. Pandey, Advocate through v.c. For Respective Respondents : Shri Satish Gupta, Government Advocate and Shri Akash Sahu, Advocate Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.04.28 12:52:03 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 22/04/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 13.2.2025 by which the assignment of mid day meal allotted to the petitioner has been cancelled without there being any lawful reason, as such this petition has been filed. He further submits that in earlier round also, the petitioner has filed a petition in which vide order dated 14.1.2025 in WPC No.4197 of 2024 this Court has considered this aspect of the matter and directed the authorities to pass appropriate reasoned orders and accordingly the order dated 13.2.2025 has been passed which is not in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that against the order passed by the Sub Divisional OfÏcer (Revenue), the petitioner is to approach before the concerned Collector as per circular dated 7.8.2012 issued by the State Government and the petitioner can very well get redressed their grievance. 3. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter that the matter is required to be considered by the Collector, without going into the merits of the case, the petitioner is directed to approach before the concerned Collector while raising their grievance. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will approach before the Collector 3 within 10 days. In turn, the Collector is directed to consider and decide the matter within 30 days from the date of approaching by the petitioner. 4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Gopal Singh