LIYAKAT KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
BAIL/11744/2025 · 2025-11-25
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176841 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176841 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11744 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for accused-applicant while pressing the bail application submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case as well as in the sole case mentioned in the gang chart. In that case, he has been released on bail. The bail order is on record as Annexure No. 3 to the bail application. Apart from the sole case mentioned in the gang chart, there is no other case pending against the accused applicant. It has been further submitted that applicant is in jail since 16.09.2025 and if facility of bail is granted, there is no apprehension that he will flee from the judicial process and he will abide by the orders passed by the Court below and will co-operate in speedy trial of the case. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but has not disputed the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused- applicant. On due consideration to the fact that in the solitary case mentioned in the gang chart, he has been enlarged on bail; apart from the solitary case mentioned in the gang chart, there is no other case pending against the applicant as well as considering the fact that the applicant is languishing Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anshul Mishra, Pragya Bhushan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Liyakat Khan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
in jail since 16.09.2025, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant, Liyakat Khan, involved in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0008 of 2025, Under Section: 2/3 U.P. Gangster And Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station: Cyber Crime, District: Raebareli, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. (iv) The applicant shall submit an undertaking on affidavit in terms of Section 19 (4) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 that he will not indulge in any case for or misuse the liberty of bail. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. November 25, 2025 R.C.
BAIL No. 11744 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench