Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:26500-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4477 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ravi Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sheetala Prasad Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
1. Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on part of the respondent no.3/Commissioner of Police at Commissionerate Prayagraj in considering the representation of the petitioner dated January 6, 2025.
3. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent no.3/Commissioner of Police at Commissionerate Prayagraj should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner dated January 6, 2025.
4. Accordingly, the respondent no.3/Commissioner of Police at Commissionerate Prayagraj is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner dated January 6, 2025 within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
5. In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 24.2.2025 Dev/- (Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad