1 2025:CGHC:2825 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 904 of 2018 Sabbir Hussain S/o Abdul Rahman Aged About 63 Years R/o Khaparganj Madarsa Irfaniliya K Baju Thana City Kotwali, Tahsil and District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The District Magistrate, Tahsil and District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Moulana Mo. Salim S/o Jahur Khan Aged About 45 Years R/o Mohalla Khaparganj, Kuber Stationary Distributor Dukan K Samne Muslim Dharmik Kitab Dukan, Police Station City Kotwali, Tahsil and District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Smt. Rubina Khan W/o Moulana Mohammad Salim Aged About 35 Years R/o Mohalla Khaparganj, Kuber Stationary Distributor Dukan K Samne Muslim Dharmik Kitab Dukan, Police Station City Kotwali, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For Petitioner : None For Respondent/State : Ms. Shubha Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 16.01.2025 1. Heard, Ms. Shubha Shrivastava, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the respondent/State. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition when the case is called out. RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN Date: 2025.01.17 20:11:55 +0530 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayer: “Therefore, it is humbly prayed before the Hon’ble Court that the findings mentioned in paragraphs 6, 7, 8, and 20 of the order passed by the Sessions Court on 13.03.2018, wherein the judicial magistrate’s order dated 08.12.2017 was deemed erroneous and not justified, may kindly be reconsidered. In such a situation, it is respectfully requested that the Hon’ble Court set aside the judicial magistrate’s order dated 08.12.2017 and the Sessions Court’s order dated 13.03.2018 and direct the judicial magistrate to pass an order under Section 204 of the Cr.P.C. against the proposed accused persons based on the sequence of events mentioned in the applicant/complainant’s complaint. It is further prayed that the application of the applicant/complainant may kindly be accepted in the interest of justice. The prayer is made in the interest of justice.” 3. Mr. Priyank Rathi, Advocate submitted that another counsel has taken NOC from the petitioner, hence it appears that the petitioner has not engaged any other counsel to press this petition. 4. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter due to efÒux of time. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed on this ground alone. 6. Let a copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan