Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176809 (ALL)

ROSHAN @ ROSHAN ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

/1848/2025 · 2025-11-27

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1848 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard Sri Ashutosh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. Present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 0188 of 2025 under Sections 2(30), 317(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) BNS, Police Station-Madhoganj, District-Hardoi. Submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant has not caught from spot. There is no recovery from the applicant and just to injured his reputation he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The applicant has criminal history of four cases which has been explained in 26 of the bail application. It is submitted that Case Crime No. 185 of 2025 and Case Crime No. 161 of 2025 have been slapped on the applicant on one recovery and in another Case Crime No. 68 of 2022 the applicant is on bail. Last Case Crime No. 623 of 2012 under Section 110 G of CPC the time for enforcement of bond has been completed. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant is willing to cooperate with the investigation. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. However, he could not dispute the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant. Considered the aforesaid and perused the record. On due consideration of facts that there appears to be no recovery, name of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Shukla, Trisha Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Roshan @ Roshan Ali .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) applicant is surfaced in the confessional statement in police custody, applicant has explained the criminal history, investigation is going on, so also the undertaking given on his behalf to cooperate in the investigation, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail subject to his cooperation in the investigation. In view of the above, it is provided that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid Case Crime number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer/S.H.O. concerned with the following conditions:- The applicant shall report to the investigating officer within twenty days from today. He shall cooperate in the investigation and he will not influence the witness. The accused-applicant will remain present as and when the arresting officer/I.O./S.H.O. concerned call(s) for investigation/interrogation. The applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. The application is allowed. November 27, 2025 Vinay/- NABAIL No. 1848 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench