Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176799 (ALL)

SATISH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

/12196/2025 · 2025-12-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12196 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 19.11.2025 passed by the Tehsildar, Sidhauli, District Sitapur in proceedings under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code. 2. Shri Narendra Gupta has filed on behalf of opposite party no.4 is taken on record. He raised preliminary objection that the petitioner has efficacious remedy of filing appeal under Section 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code. 3. Counsel for the petitioner at this stage does not dispute the aforesaid facts and submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file an appeal under Section 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code. 4. It is provided that in case the appeal is filed within next two weeks, the opposite party shall consider the same with expedition. 5. The parties appearing before this Court have undertaken to cooperate in the proceedings before the appellate authority and will not take any unnecessary adjournments. 6. With the aforesaid observations the writ petition stands disposed of. December 16, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Misra, Shiv Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Satish Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench