DHARMESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO
BAIL/5635/2025 · 2025-11-04
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176785 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176785 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5635 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite notice.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.237 of 2024 under Sections 103(1), 238 BNS, P.S.- Nigohan, District- Lucknow.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that similarly situated co- accused, namely, Sangeeta has already been enlarged on bail by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.07.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.6690 of 2025. Therefore, applicant is also entitled to be released on bail.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering and adopting the reasoning as contained in the order dated 24.07.2025 coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 16.12.2024 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant- Dharmesh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ambrish Kumar Pandey, Arvind Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dharmesh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 4, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 5635 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench