AMITABH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA @ AMITABH SRIVASTAVA THRU. SON AYUSH SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/11633/2025 · 2025-12-15
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176777 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176777 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11633 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents and Sri Akarsh Asthana holding brief of Sri Rahul Tripathi, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause no longer survives, hence, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) December 15, 2025 AKK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Desh Mitra Anand, Prateek Rawat Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Rohit Tripathi
Amitabh Kumar Srivastava @ Amitabh Srivastava Thru. Son Ayush Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench