AJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/10589/2024 · 2025-10-29
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176769 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176769 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10589 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 38 of 2024, under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323, 504, 506, 427, 302 IPC, PS Akhand Nagar, District Sultanpur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the co accused Dharmraj and Danbahadur were enlarged on bail vide order dated 27.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 10775 of 2024. The applicant were not named in the FIR for causing the injury concerned. The allegations are similar to the co accused Dharmraj and Dan Bahadur who have been enlarged on bail.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the nature of allegations against the applicant to be similar in terms of FIR, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 24.02.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Ajay Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Kumar Nayak, Jay Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ajay Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 29, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 10589 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench