Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176756 (ALL)

SANTOSH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/11887/2025 · 2025-11-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11887 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.102 of 2025 under sections 137(2), 87, 65 BNS, and section 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Gaidas Bujurg, District Balrampur. 3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that the daughter of the informant aged about 16 years was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently, in her statement, the victim stated that she knew the applicant for the last three months and had gone on his calling and thereafter physical relations were also formed. The tentative age of the victim is around sixteen years. 4. Considering the statement and the medical not corroborating any of the allegations, the applicant who is in custody since 30.10.2025 is entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant Santosh Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Kr. Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Santosh Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 28, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 11887 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench