- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2219 WP No. 43099 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 43099 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. Y RAJU S/O LATE YAAMAN YALLAPPA, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS, R/O 'RENUKA NILAYA', BEHIND KENDADESHWARI TEMPLE, GADIKOPPA, SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577 205. 2. RENUKA.S.G.@ RENUKA KUMAR S/O LATE Y.SHEKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS, R/O SAGAR ROAD, GADIKOPPA, SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577 205. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJENDRA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S.V.PRAKASH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS, K.R.CIRCLE, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2219 WP No. 43099 of 2017 BENGALURU-560 001. 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS, K R CIRCLE, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS, SHIVAMOGGA DIVISION, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201. 6. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS, SHIVAMOGGA SUB DIVISION, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201. 7. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, KARNATAKA STATE HIGHWAYS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (KSHIP), K R CIRCLE, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 8. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KARNATAKA STATE HIGHWAYS, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (KSHIP), SHIVAMOGGA-577 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1, 2, 7 & 8; R3, 4, 5 & 6-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2219 WP No. 43099 of 2017 ORAL ORDER Sri.Rajendra., counsel on behalf of Sri.S.V.Prakash., for the petitioners has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioners submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the petitioners to withdraw the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the order and will not file the Review Petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 15