Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176726 (ALL)

SONALI BANSAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND

NABAIL/32/2024 · 2025-10-31

Saurabh Lavania

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 32 of 2024 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant to press this application. 2. It appears that the applicant and the counsel engaged by him have lost the interest in the case and are not interested in pursuing the application, which is pending since 2024. 3. It would be appropriate to refer two maxims:- (i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights); and (ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the society as a whole, the litigation must come to an end). 4. The above said two maxims are sister provisions, which would highlight and spotlight that the party seeking remedy before the Court should be vigilant, otherwise, the law would not come to their help and there should be end to litigation. 5. Considering the aforesaid, this Court feels that the application should not be disposed of on merits and should be dismissed for non-prosecution. Accordingly, it is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 31, 2025 Arun/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Upmanyu Srivastava, Tushar Kant Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Amar Singh, Kapil Dev Chaubey (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Sonali Bansal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench