Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176713 (ALL)

RAJIYA BANO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER

C372/145/2025 · 2025-11-04

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL U/S 372 CR.P.C. No. - 145 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard Sri V.K. Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Umesh Varma, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant has stated that due to inadvertent and incurable defects in the memo of appeal, he is willing to not press this appeal at this stage and liberty may be given to the appellant to file fresh appeal. 3. He has further submitted that direction may be issued to return all the certified copy which have been annexed with this appeal. 4. Considering the aforesaid request of learned counsel for the appellant, this criminal appeal is dismissed being not pressed at this stage with the aforesaid liberty. 5. Office is directed to return all the certified copy which have been annexed with this appeal to the learned counsel for the appellant after keeping its photocopy on record. November4,2025 Suresh/ Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Vimal Kishor Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Rajiya Bano .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench