Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17671 (RAJ)

PUSHPENDRA SINGH S/O SH. DHARM SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/2637/2025 · 2025-05-22

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21548] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2637/2025 Pushpendra Singh S/o Sh. Dharm Singh, R/o Bhainsina, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur. ----Complainant/Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Tonk Road, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Bharatpur, District Bharatpur. 4. S.H.O. Police Station, Kotwali Bharatpur, District Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Asgar Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P. with Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 22/05/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that FIR was lodged by the petitioner on 26.03.2025 under Sections 108, 115(2) and 126(2) of B.N.S. and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a limited prayer for fair and impartial investigation. Learned counsel for the respondents has raised no objection if personal hearing is given to the petitioner before the concerned Superintendent of Police of the jurisdiction. In light of the same, and in light of the directions encapsulated in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [2025:RJ-JP:21548] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2637/2025] [(2008) 2 SCC 409] it is directed that on 28.05.2025 at 11.00 AM, the petitioner shall mark his presence before concerned Superintendent of Police (respondent No.3) who will give audience to the petitioner and take appropriate decision, strictly in accordance with law. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J GAURAV/44