APHC010350812025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 17854/2025 Between: 1. I DEVAMMA @ LAKSHMIDEVI, W/O.LATE.NANE NAIK @ SOMLA NAIK AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCCIAGRICULUTRE, R/O.GOPALPURAM VILLAGE, H/O.VEICHELAMALA VILLAGE, N.P.KUNTA MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT, PUTTAPARTHY. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADIRI REVENUE DIVISION, KADIRI. 4. THE TAHSILDHAR, N.P.KUNTA MANDAL, N.P.KUNTA VILLAGE, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 5. B NARAYANA, S/O. PEDDAUTHANNA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O.D.NO.3-16, EGUVAPALLI VILLAGE, VELICHELIMALLA MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in D.Dis.No.257/2025/D , dated 25.06.2025 issued by the respondent No.3 cancelling the PattadarPassboook and Title Deeds issued in my favour for the land in an extent of Ac.5.00 cents in Sy.No.1281-3 of Velichelamala Village, N.P.Kunta Mandal Sri Sathya Sai District by entertaining a suo moto appeal under Section 5(5) of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbook Act, 1971, at the instance of the respondent No.5 as arbitrary, illegal, one without jurisdiction contrary to the procedure envisaged under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and the law laid down by this Honble Court in the case of Thripuravaram Krishna Reddy vs The Joint Collector, Cuddapah reported in 2009 (1) ALD 49 and Ratnamma V. State of Andhra Pradesh reported in 2015 (6) ALD 609 (DB) apart from being violative of the fundamental and Constitutional rights guaranteed to under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and us consequently set aside the same and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the proceedings in D.Dis.No.257/2025/D, dated 25.06.2025 issued by the respondent No.3, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B.ABHAY SIDDHANTH MOOTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition, for which, he addressed a letter dated 02.04.2026 to the Registrar (Judicial). 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 06.04.2026 SCH 4 129 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN W.P.No.17854 of 2025 Date: 06.04.2026 SCH