Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176694 (ALL)

UMAPATI PANDEY v. DR. MAHENDRA DEV, DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, U.P. ALLAHABAD AND ANOTHER

/2099/2025 · 2025-11-20

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2099 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. The respondent has filed further compliance affidavit (which is taken on record) enclosing therein the order dated 12.11.2025 taking decision on the claim of the applicant for payment of interest in compliance of the judgment and order dated 07.03.2025 passed in Writ A No. 23645 of 2021. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the judgment and order passed by the writ Court has been complied with as such the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that though the order has been complied with but he is disputing the decision taken by the respondent, otherwise for all practical purposes, the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous, with liberty to the applicant if he is still aggrieved, he may be permitted to challenge the same by filing a writ petition. In view of above, the present contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous. Notice, if any, stands discharged. It is always open for the applicant to avail the remedy as may be permissible under the law. November 20, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vyomesh Chandra Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Manish Kumar,J.) Umapati Pandey .....Applicant(s) Dr. Mahendra Dev, Director Of Secondary Education, U.P. Allahabad And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench