DILEEP VISHWAKARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/7883/2025 · 2025-11-25
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176692 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176692 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7883 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.12 of 2025, under Section 64(1), 333, 351(3) BNS & Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, P.S. Sareni, District Raebareli. 3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that the daughter of the informant aged about 17 years was caught hold of by the applicant and he started misbehaving and thereafter, he took her in a room where wrong was committed. In the statement under Section 180 BNSS, victim stated that she was asked to get packet of Gutka which she refused and thereafter, the applicant caught hold of her, took her in a room and wrong was committed and when her mother and brother came, she informed the same to them. In the statement under Section 183 BNSS, the same version was reiterated, however, it was stated that apart from the penetrative sexual assault, other improper acts were also done and when her sister and brother came, they called her father and and the applicant was beaten up. Medical on record done of the very next day does not indicate presence of any injury. Tentative age of the victim is around 17 years. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the medical not corroborating the allegation, the applicant Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailendra Pathak, Km. Anjali Gautam Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Santosh Kumar Tripathi Dileep Vishwakarma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
who is in custody since 17.01.2025 and has no criminal antecedents, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant Dileep Vishwakarma be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 25, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 7883 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench