DILERAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/10466/2025 · 2025-10-29
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176687 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176687 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10466 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Rudra Pratap Pal, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 163 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) BNS & Section 5(1)/6 POCSO Act & 3(2)V SC/ST Act, PS Ranipur, District Bahraich.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was enticed on the false pretext of marriage by the applicant. In her statement under Section 183 BNSS the victim stated that she knew the applicant since last one and half months and physical relation was also formed in between them. The tentative age of the victim is around 19 years.
4. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 23.08.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Dileram be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pawan Kumar Sharma, Ankit Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dileram .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 29, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 10466 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench