Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176683 (ALL)

RAJITRAM AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. TO THE DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

A482/9296/2025 · 2025-11-11

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9296 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicants is taken on record. 2. Sri Pankaj Verma, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of private respondents, which is taken on record. 3. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for private respondents as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 4. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 4809/2021 (1085/2021) (State Vs. Rajitram and others), pending in the court of learned Sessions Judge, Gonda arising out of Case Crime No. 200/2020 under section-323, 324, 325, 504 I.P.C. relating to Police Station-Nawabganj, District-Gonda including the impugned charge sheet as well as impugned summoning order dated 09.03.2021 as contained in Annexure No.1 & 2 respectively to this petition." 5. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No. S.A.-1 of the supplementary affidavit. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amritansh Mohan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajitram And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. To The Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 5 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 7. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 8. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 9. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 10. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. November 11, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 9296 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench