IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15630 of 2016 ====================================================== 1. Shail Kumari Devi @ Shail Devi W/o Sri Tejendra Prasad Singh 2. Jai Shankar Kunwar S/o Late Ram Chandra Kunwar 3. Nand Kishore Paswan S/o Late Bela Paswan 4. Ram Kalevar Paswan S/o Late Prabhu Paswan 5. Ram Sakal Paswan S/o Late Kailuth Paswan 6. Bir Bahadur Paswan S/o Late Anand Paswan 7. Brij Mohan Kunwar S/o Late Lakshmi Kunwar 8. Mostt. Sudha Devi W/o Late Ashok Kunwar 9. Hari Shankar Kunwar S/o Late Kapil Deo Kunwar 10. Vijay Kumar S/o Late Kamleshwari Kunwar All resident of P.O. Keotsa, P.S. Gaighat, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna 3. Collector, Muzaffarpur 4. Special Land Acquisition officer, Gandak Project, Muzaffarpur 5. Circle officer, Gaighat, District Muzaffarpur 6. Sub Registrar, Katra, District Muzaffarpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Saptashwa Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Roy- GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 05-08-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “(i) To command the Respondents to give fair compensation to the petitioners against the land acquired by them for construction of Patna High Court CWJC No.15630 of 2016(2) dt.05-08-2025 2/2 Baghmati Bayan Tatbandh at Mauza Keotsa, as per the provisions enumerated in the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter 'the Act'). (ii) To pass any other order/orders as be deemed fit and proper in the background of the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. Learned State counsel has taken this Court to the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 3 and 4 after service of copy to the learned counsel for the petitioner in the year 2019 and as per paragraph - 7, award was prepared and the compensation amount has been received by the petitioners without any protest. 4. In that background, allowing the petitioners to approach appropriate authority/Court, if they are still aggrieved by the said award, the writ petition stands disposed of. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U