Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17666 (KAR)

SRI.NAGARAJ NAIK C v. THE DIRECTOR

WP/5059/2025 · 2025-04-01

R Nataraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:13572 WP No. 5059 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 5059 OF 2025 (S-TR) BETWEEN: SRI.NAGARAJ NAIK.C, S/O CHANDRA NAIK, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, WORKING AS ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE.), O AND M SUB-DIVISON, BESCOM, HARIHARA, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT -577 601. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIRUPAKSHAIAH P H, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DIRECTOR, (ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES) KPTCL, CORPORATE OFFICE, KAVERI BHAWAN, BANGALORE -560 009. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, (ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES) CORPORATE OFFICE, BESCOM, K.R.CIRCLE, BANGALORE -560 009. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE.), O AND M DIVISION, BESCOM, HARIHARA, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 601. 4. SRI.LAKSHMAPPA.K., FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOW TO PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, WORKING AS ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE) O AND M SUB DIVISION- 2, HESCOM, RANIBENNUR, HAVERI DISTRICT -581 115. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ASHWIN G.RAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 SRI.V. MAHESHA, ADVOCATE FOR R-4, R-3 SERVED) Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13572 WP No. 5059 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE TRANSFER ORDER DATED 14.02.2025 BEARING NO. KPTCL/GMP/MES(B58)/6/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-G PASSED THE 1ST RESPONDENT AUTHORITY IN SO FAR AS POSTING OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT AND THE PETITIONER ARE CONCERNED AT SL. NO. 1 AND 2 RESPECTIVELY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition as it has become infructuous. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE BKN/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11