SAROJ CHAUDHARY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/6366/2024 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176649 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176649 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6366 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioners and, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Learned AGA for the State does not dispute the aforesaid fact.
3. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 24, 2025 kkv/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Akhand Pratap Singh (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Saroj Chaudhary And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench