Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176647 (ALL)

AKHILENDRA KUMAR VERMA AND 11 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REGISTRATION DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/13727/2025 · 2025-11-27

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13727 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to include the services rendered by them on honorarium basis prior to regularization for purposes of computation as qualifying service for pensionary benefits. A prayer has also been made for granting pension to petitioners under Old Pension Scheme (OPS). 3. Since considering petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representations before opposite party no.2 i.e. Inspector General of Registration, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same, in light of judgment rendered by this Court in Writ-A No. 731 of 2024, Jai Ram Sharma v. State of U.P. and others, in case same is applicable, within a period of eight weeks, from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 27, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : D.K. Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Akhilendra Kumar Verma And 11 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Registration Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench