SHALU YADAV W/O SHRI SURESH KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/3458/2021 · 2025-01-09
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17664 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17664 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:1522] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.4068/2021 Kamal Kumar Yadav Son Of Shri Hanuman Sahay Ji, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Ganesh Mandir Road, Viratnagar, Dist. Jaipur Police Station Virat Nagar Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Suresh Kumar Yadav Son Of Shri Dhuni Lal Yadav, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village Udavala Nai Dhani Manoharpura Dist. Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.3458/2021 Shalu Yadav W/o Shri Suresh Kumar Yadav, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Gram Udaiawala Nai Dhani, Manoharpur Distt. Jaipur, Police Station Mahoharpur Jaipur (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Jaipur
3. Superintendent Of Police, Rural, Jaipur District Jaipur
4. Suresh Kumar Son Of Ghuni Lal Yadav, Resident Gram Udaiwala Nai Dhani Manoharpura, Distt. Jaipur
5. Umrao Yadav Son Unknown, Through Suresh Kumar Resident Of Gram Udaiawala Nai Dhani Manoharpur Distt. Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr.Vivek Choudhary, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 09/01/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:1522] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4068/2021]
1. This criminal misc. petition is lying pending before this Court in defect side for last several years and no steps have been taken by the counsel for the petitioners to cure the defect(s).
2. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this matter and she/he have lost interest in pursuing the matters.
3. In view of the above, the criminal misc. petitions stand dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. All other application(s), pending, if any, also stand dismissed.
5. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to move application for revival of this criminal misc. petition, in case, any cause of action or grievance still survives.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /422 & 423