Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176636 (ALL)

RAJ KUMAR GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF FOREST CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/11300/2025 · 2025-11-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11300 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated 04.11.2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.3 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No. 3/ Divisional/District Forest Officer, Gonda Forest Division, Gonda is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Dubey, Abhishek Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Raj Kumar Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Forest Civil Sectt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. November 26, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 11300 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench