SIYA RAAM YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/12909/2025 · 2025-11-06
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176631 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176631 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12909 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed for following relief:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to make the payment of retiral dues and consequential benefits to the petitioner such as gratuity, arrears etc. while the petitioner received provisional gratuity, in which leave encashment Rs.5,80,380.00 and GPF Rs.20,07,431.00 only on the retirement who retired on 31.01.2017 on the grade pay of 4200 with satisfactory service as police constable, in the interest of justice."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.5 i.e. Superintendent of Police, District Lakhimpur who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 6, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhup Chandra Singh, Abdul Raheem Khan, Priyanka Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Siya Raam Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench