Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17663 (RAJ)

MOHD. AEJAZ AKBAR S/O ABDUL MAJEED v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

/427/2025 · 2025-08-12

Sanjeet Purohit, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:31322-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 427/2025 Mohd. Aejaz Akbar S/o Abdul Majeed, R/o H.No. 7-7775/6 Naya Mohalla, Mominpura, Gulbarga 585104, Karnataka (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur Rajasthan). Through His Father-Abdul Majeed S/o Late Abdul Aziz, Aged About 75 Years, R/o H.No. 5-993/32/37/417, Gulshan E-Arfat Colony, Hagarga Road, Gulbarga University Police Station Kalaburagi, Gulbarga 585104 Karnataka. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Mr. Parveen Singh, Under Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of India, Is-II, Division/legal Cell-1, 2Nd Floor, Major Dhyan Chand National Stadium, Near India Gate, New Delhi. 3. Mr. Anand Kumar, Secretary Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 4. Mr. Rakesh Mohan, Superintendent Central Jail, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tekchand Swami with Mr. Harshit Sharma and Mr. Dilip Meena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sunita Meena, AGC with Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma, AAAG for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 12/08/2025 1. This contempt petition has been filed stating that the respondents have not taken a decision with regard to the [2025:RJ-JP:31322-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-427/2025] application moved for seeking parole for 40 days whereas, we noticed that as per Annexure-10 dated 10.07.2025 placed on record, the State Government has conveyed its approval of rejection of the application for grant of parole for 40 days. Thus, a decision has already been taken. 2. The contempt petition is totally misconceived and same is accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. 3. Notices stands discharged. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J GAURAV/45