Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1578 CRL.RP No. 389 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.389 OF 2022 BETWEEN:
SRI R V SUBRAMANI S/O MILITARY VENKATARAREDDY AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT RAYAPPALI VILLAGE AMBAJIDURGA HOBLI CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT …PETITIONER (BY SRI SADAKATH U, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:
SRI ANJAPPA S/O SRI NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT MALLIKARJUNAPPA VILLAGE AMBAJIDURGA HOBLI CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT …RESPONDENT (BY SRI VENKATESH C, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND
ORDER OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AND FINE IMPOSED BY THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1578 CRL.RP No. 389 of 2022
CHINTHAMANI IN C.C.NO.140/2017 DATED 20.01.2020 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL ORDER
The counsel for the petitioner is absent.
2. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the Trial Court convicted the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act and ordered to pay a fine of Rs.2,50,000/- and also noted that the petitioner has already paid an amount of Rs.50,000/- and hence, remaining amount payable is Rs.2,00,000/-, in default, the petitioner shall undergo for simple imprisonment for a period of one year.
3. The learned counsel for the respondent further submits that the petitioner has already paid the remaining amount of Rs.2,00,000/- and the respondent had withdrawn an amount of Rs.1,90,000/- and remaining
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1578 CRL.RP No. 389 of 2022
amount of Rs.10,000/- is vest with the State as ordered by the Trial Court.
4. In view of the said submission and amount has already been received by the respondent and hence, the
order of the Trial Court is complied and therefore, no purpose would be served in keeping this matter pending. Accordingly the revision petition is disposed of in terms of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN