APHC010241972013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Between: 1. N.SRINIVASULU, S/O.VEERENDER, R/O.D.NO.4866, MIG (NEW) PHASE-II, BHEL, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, HYDERABAD. 1. N HEMALATHA, W/O.N.SRINIVASULU, D/O.T.M.RADHA KRISHNA, R/O.D.NO.17/395, MAHENDRA STREET, GUNTAKAL. 2. THE STATE OF A P REP BY P P, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Case, the High Court may in this Hon'ble Court aggrieved by the Judgment dt.26.11.2012 passed in MC No.21 of 2010 on the file of the Judl. Magistrate First Class, Guntakal, for the following and among other. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CRLRCMP 1193 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone delay of 26 days in representing Crl.R.C SR No.5820 of 2013 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2013(CRLRCMP 1242 OF 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 808 OF 2013 N.SRINIVASULU, S/O.VEERENDER, R/O.D.NO.4866, MIG (NEW) II, BHEL, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND N HEMALATHA, W/O.N.SRINIVASULU, D/O.T.M.RADHA KRISHNA, R/O.D.NO.17/395, MAHENDRA STREET, GUNTAKAL. THE STATE OF A P REP BY P P, HIGH COURT OF A.P., ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this criminal Revision Case in this Hon'ble Court aggrieved by the Judgment dt.26.11.2012 passed in MC No.21 of 2010 on the file of the Judl. Magistrate First Class, Guntakal, for the 2013(CRLRCMP 1193 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone delay of 26 days in representing Crl.R.C SR No.5820 of 2013 and IA NO: 2 OF 2013(CRLRCMP 1242 OF 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3369] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO N.SRINIVASULU, S/O.VEERENDER, R/O.D.NO.4866, MIG (NEW) ...PETITIONER N HEMALATHA, W/O.N.SRINIVASULU, D/O.T.M.RADHA KRISHNA, THE STATE OF A P REP BY P P, HIGH COURT OF A.P., ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision present this criminal Revision Case in this Hon'ble Court aggrieved by the Judgment dt.26.11.2012 passed in MC No.21 of 2010 on the file of the Judl. Magistrate First Class, Guntakal, for the Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone delay of 26 days in representing Crl.R.C SR No.5820 of 2013 and Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner, pursuant to order Judgment dt.26.11.2012 passed in M.C.No.21 of 2010 on the file of the Judl. Magistrate First Class, Guntakal, pending disposal of the criminal revision case and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 3814 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the stay orders passed on 17.04.2013 in Crl.RCMP.No.1242/2013 in Crl.RC.No.808/2013 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. I MAAMU VANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SIVA REDDY 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER:- This Criminal Revision Case under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., is filed aggrieved by the judgment dated 26.11.2012 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Guntakal, in M.C.No.21 of 2010. 2. Heard. Perused the entire material on record. 3. A perusal of the report received from the learned Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Guntakal, goes to show that there is no dispute between the parties with regard to matrimonial dispute as the parties were got divorced and dispute between them for maintenance is resolved and prayed to dispose of the Criminal Revision Case. 4. Considering the report submitted by the learned Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Guntakal, the petition is disposed of as it has become infructuous. Accordingly, Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Petition, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 22.7.2025 TJN 27 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 808 OF 2013 Dated: 22.7.2025 TJN