[2025:RJ-JP:18494] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No. 159/2025 In S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 753/2025 1. Gangaram S/o Khairati, R/o Bhatpura Kheda, Police Station Nagar, (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) 2. Ramprasad S/o Mangaturam, R/o Bhatpura Kheda, Police Station Nagar, (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) 3. Bhappa @ Hukamchand S/o Ramprasad, R/o Bhatpura Kheda, Police Station Nagar, (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) 4. Hariram S/o Mangaturam, R/o Bhatpura Kheda, Police Station Nagar, (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) 5. Parsi @ Parasram S/o Mangaturam, R/o Bhatpura Kheda, Police Station Nagar, (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioners : Mr. Aatish Jain, Adv. For Respondent : Ms. Manju Dave, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 02/05/2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that there is no reliable and legally acceptable evidence to hold the [2025:RJ-JP:18494] (2 of 3) [SOSR 159/2025 in CRLR-753/2025] accused-applicants guilty for the alleged offence(s) and there is every likelihood of succeeding in the criminal revision. Learned counsel further submits that accused-applicants were on bail during trial as well as during pendency of appeal and presently they are behind bars. Learned counsel further submits that final hearing of the revision is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicants may be suspended. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties. Without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case and considering the arguments advanced by the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicants. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court and affirmed by the learned appellate Court against the accused-applicants namely, (1) Gangaram S/o Khairati, (2) Ramprasad S/o Mangaturam, (3) Bhappa @ Hukamchand S/o Ramprasad, (4) Hariram S/o Mangaturam & (5) Parsi @ Parasram S/o Mangaturam in Criminal Case No.208/2007 shall remain suspended during pendency of the petition and they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear [2025:RJ-JP:18494] (3 of 3) [SOSR 159/2025 in CRLR-753/2025] before this Court on 05.06.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J YOGESH KUMAR /12