SUHAIL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/6810/2025 · 2025-11-07
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176607 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176607 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6810 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.43 of 2025, under Section 69 of BNS and Section 5/6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Alapur, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 19 years was enticed by the applicant and on the false pretext of marriage, physical relations were formed. Subsequently, in the statement under Section 183 of BNSS, the victim did not support the prosecution case and stated that physical relations were formed with her consent and now the applicant is refusing to marry her.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the statement of the victim, who is 19 years of age and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 17.03.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Suhail be released on bail in the aforesaid first Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashok Kumar Singh, Ashish Kumar Tiwari, Manoj Kumar Mishra, Piyush Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Suhail .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 7, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 6810 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench