Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17660 (KAR)

SRI M A SUDARSHAN v. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER

WP/41496/2017 · 2025-01-13

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1209 WP No. 41496 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 41496 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI M.A.SUDARSHAN S/O LATE ADINARAYANA SETTY, MAJOR, 55 YEARS, R/AT: "SRI LAKSHMI ADINARAYANA NILAYA", NO.143, 5TH MAIN ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-560 018. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.MOHAMED IBRAHIM., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MOHAN DAS RAO.T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, CORPORATION BANK, NO.24, 3RD MAIN, 4TH CROSS, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-560 018. 2. SRI M.A.SATHYAPRASAD S/O LATE ADINARAYANA SETTY, PROPRIETOR, M/S VANPAC SYSTEMS, R/AT "SRI. LAKSHMI ADINARAYANA NILAYA", NO.143, 5TH MAIN ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-560 018. 3. SRI D.V.SRIDHAR S/O SRI D.N.VISHWANATHA SETTY, MAJOR, R/AT 'SRI LAKSHMI ADINARAYANA NILAYA', Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1209 WP No. 41496 of 2017 NO.143, 5TH MAIN ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-560 018. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.B.RAVISHANKAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. R3-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.M.Mohammed Ibrahim., counsel on behalf of Sri.Mohan Das Rao.T., for the petitioner and Sri.V.B.Ravishankar., counsel for respondent No.1 have appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel Sri.M.Mohammed Ibrahim., submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the petitioner about infructuous of the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file review petition. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1209 WP No. 41496 of 2017 The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 15