IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7253 of 2022 Date of Decision: 25.6.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Pramod Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Nemo for the petitioner. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the State. Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3. __________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Despite repeated pass-overs, neither petitioner nor his counsel has come present. 2. Perusal of court file reveals that counsel has not been appearing on behalf of the petitioner for quite some time. Lastly, matter was listed on 4.6.2025, but despite repeated pass-overs, none came present on behalf of the petitioner. Matter was listed on 21.5.2025, on which date also, none came present on his behalf and matter was again adjourned for 2 today. Today also, neither petitioner nor his counsel has come present to impart instructions. 3. In view of above, this Court has reason to believe that the petitioner is not interested to pursue his case and as such, same is dismissed in default on account of repeated absence of the counsel for the petitioner as well as the petitioner. All pending applications stand disposed of. June 25, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge