HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 928 of 2015 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Raghvendra Kumar Singh II, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that he does not want to press this writ petition on the instructons of the petitioners and the same may be dismissed as not pressed. 3. Learned Standing Counsel does not have any objection to the aforesaid request. 4. In light of the statement made by learned counsel for petitioners at bar, the writ petition is dismissed as not not pressed. December 17, 2025 Ravi/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raghvendra Kumar Singh Ii, Rajiv Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rajiv Srivastava, Sandeep Tewari, Sandhya Dubey (Alok Mathur,J.) Smt. Zahira Begum And Ors. .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Consolidation District Raibareli And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench