SAURABH SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDIL. CHIEF SECY. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/1879/2024 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176581 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176581 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1879 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records.
2. The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR/Case Crime No.161 of 2024 under sections 105 and 318(4) BNS, P.S. Aalapur, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. It is argued that the applicant was granted the benefit of interim anticipatory bail vide order dated 21.08.2024.
4. It is informed that the charge-sheet has been filed and there is nothing on record to demonstrate that the applicant did not cooperate with the investigation, as such, the interim bail is extended till the conclusion of the trial.
5. The present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly allowed.
6. Thus, in the event of the applicant Saurabh Singh surrendered before the trial court, he shall be released on anticipatory bail till the conclusion of the trial in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.30,000/- each separately to the satisfaction of Court below concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nadeem Murtaza, Akanksha Bajpayee, Shashank Tilhari, Wali Nawaz Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Saurabh Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. November 26, 2025 VNP/- ABAIL No. 1879 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench