Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17658 (AP)

Gobburu Jagdeesh Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/15882/2020 · 2025-09-03

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010241372020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 15882 of 2020 Between: 1. GOBBURU JAGDEESH KUMAR, S/O. PEDDA REDDAIAH, AGE 52 R/O.SINGAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, PENGALUR MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF PLOT NO.46, SAI NILAYAM, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PENAGALUR PS, PENGALURU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. SRI NARAYANA SWAMY REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, THE DEPUTY SUPERINTEDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. SRI CHENNAKESHAV, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PENAGALUR PS, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. SRI Y CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY, S/O. Y.JAYARAMI REDDY, 52 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO. B-401, BEGONIA HOMES, BESIDE TENNIS COURT, ALKAPUR TOWNSHIP, PUPPALGUDA, MANIKONDA, HYDERABAD-89. 6. SRI MURALI REDDY, S/O. RAMANA REDDY, MAJOR, R/O. GUDURU, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. CELL NO. 8500299510 7. SRI L SRINIVAS REDDY, S/O.YELLA REDDY, MAJOR, R/O. NALLAPUREDDYPALLE VILLAGE, PENAGALURU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. CELL NO. 9550532006 8. MR VENKATESH, S/O. GANGAIAH, MAJOR R/O. KARNABALA KUNTA VILLAGE, PENGALURU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may 2 be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 herein harassing the petitioner for settling out the dispute with the respondent No. 5 herein at the behest of the respondents 5 to 8 owing to the pressures brought out by them through their political identities and directing the petitioner to pay the amount and were threatening to do way with his life, as being illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not, to infringe the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under the Constitution, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. P GANGA RAMI REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 herein harassing the petitioner for settling out the dispute with the respondent No. 5 herein at the behest of the respondents 5 to 8 owing to the pressures brought out by them through their political identities and directing the petitioner to pay the amount and were threatening to do way with his life, as being illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not, to infringe the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under the Constitution, and pass ....” 2. Sri Aditya Harsha Vardhan, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that in the light of the interim order passed by this Court on 08.09.2020, 3 no further orders are necessary and this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of by making the interim order passed by this Court on 08.09.2020 as absolute. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 15882 of 2020 04.09.2025 Mjl /*