X/COMPLAINANT OF FIR NO. 0071/2024 U/S 363 IPC v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND OTHERS
CRLP/4685/2024 · 2025-11-15
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176569 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176569 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4685 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the bar that the relief, as prayed in this writ petition, has already been exhausted and, as such, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned AGA for the State does not dispute the aforesaid fact. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 15, 2025 kkv/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arjun Singh Somvanshi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) X/Complainant Of Fir No. 0071/2024 U/S 363 Ipc .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench