Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176562 (ALL)

RAM CHANDER AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECY. REVENUE LUCKNOW AND OTHERS

WRIC/1004111/2006 · 2025-10-31

Irshad Ali

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1004111 of 2006 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. 1. List has been revised. None for the petitioners. Sri Divesh Mishra, learned Standing Counsel is present. 2. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Interim order, if any, is vacated. October 31, 2025 Gautam Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Balram Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., R.N.Gupta, Sarfraz Ahmad, Vinod Pandey (Irshad Ali,J.) Ram Chander And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Through Secy. Revenue Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench