Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17656 (JHR)

BIPALAB SARDAR ALIAS WIPLAW PAHARIYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4156/2025 · 2025-08-07

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:22200 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 4156 of 2025 1.Bipalab Sardar @ Wiplaw Pahariya, age about 25 years, son of Jitu Sardar @ Jeetu Pahariya, resident of village Kurapara, P.O. Pakur, P.S. Pakur (T), District-Pakur (Jharkhand) 2. Astham Sardar, age about 26 years son of Bhushan Sardar, resident of village Kitajor, P.O. Pakur, P.S. Pakur (T), District-Pakur (Jharkhand) ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Md. Yasir Arafat, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, A.P.P. ------ 05/ 07.08.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Pakur Town P.S. Case No. 69/2025 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 351(2), 3 (5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is false allegation of snatching and assault. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State oppose the prayer and submits that even the ring finger was cut by one of the accused person and the accused persons taken away the ring of the victim. 5. Considering that allegation of snatching and robbery are there and further allegation is there that ring finger was cut by one of the miscreants, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-