Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176551 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. CIVIL SECRT. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/2348/2024 · 2025-11-18

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2348 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioner and, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned AGA for the State does not dispute the aforesaid fact. 3. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 18, 2025 kkv/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Yadav, Nilesh Kumar Rao Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, Pradeep Kumar Shukla, Yogesh Prajapati (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Anil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench