MIHILAL @ MEHILAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/889/2025 · 2025-11-19
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176544 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176544 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 889 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. No one appears on behalf of the applicant even in the revised list.
2. The Counsel for the applicant states that the application is rendered infructuous as the applicant has already been arrested.
3. It is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. November 19, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pradeep Kumar Shukla, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, Yogesh Prajapati Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Mihilal @ Mehilal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench