Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17653 (KAR)

MRS PRAVEENA DEVATA v. MR BANDARU NAVEENKUMAR

WP/5148/2021 · 2025-06-03

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18708 WP No. 5148 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 5148 OF 2021 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. PRAVEENA DEVATA W/O MR. BANDARU NAVEENKUMAR AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 2. KUM. SREENIDHI BANDARU D/O MR.BANDARU NAVEENKUMAR AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS, MINOR- REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN) MRS.PRAVEENA DEVATA BOTH ARE R/AT T-03, PEARL CORONET SUDDAGUNTAPALYA C.V. RAMAN NAGAR BENGALURU-560 093 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SABASTIAN M.A., ADVOCATE) AND: MR.BANDARU NAVEENKUMAR S/O MR.JANARDHAN BANDARU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT H NO.10-1-72/1 SRINIVASA NAGAR COLONY ADJACENT TO INDRA AND NAGENDRA THEATRE , LINGOJIGUDA SAROORNAGAR, HYDERABAD TELANGANA-500 035 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.G.B.BHARATH GOWDA, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE / MODIFY THE ORDER DATED: 23.01.2021 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. PRINCIPAL Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18708 WP No. 5148 of 2021 FAMILY COURT IN C.MISC. 533/2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO PAY THE ARREARS OF MAINTENANCE OF RS.20,000/- PER MONTH FAILING WHICH DIRECT THE FAMILY COURT TO ISSUE WARRANT UNDER SECTION 125(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed questioning the order passed in Crl.Misc.No.533/2018 dated 23.01.2021 by the II Addl. Principal Family Court, Bengaluru. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in the year 2023 the main petition itself is disposed of by the Family Court and as such nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is 'dismissed as infructuous’. All I.As., in the writ petition, shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE BN/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51