SATYA PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA v. COMMISSIONER FAIZABAD DIVISION FAIZABAD AND OTHERS
WRIA/28435/2016 · 2025-12-17
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176523 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176523 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 28435 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 17, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudheer Tripathi, Virendra Kumar Shukla (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Satya Prakash Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) Commissioner Faizabad Division Faizabad And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench