SUNEEL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/11200/2025 · 2025-11-18
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176509 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176509 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11200 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. None appears for informant despite notice.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 555 of 2025, under sections 115(2), 70(2), 351(3) BNS, Section 5/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Kotwali Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant aged about 16 years had gone out of her home when two co accused including the applicant had committed wrong on her. In the statement under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS the victim reiterated the said version. The medical of the victim was done on 23.7.2025 i.e. the very next date does not corroborate any of the said allegations. Co accused have been enlarged on bail on the ground of juvenility.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the medical report on record does not corroborate the allegations, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 23.7.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Suneel be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Babu Ram, Sunil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Suneel .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 18, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11200 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench