AMARJEET v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/10342/2025 · 2025-11-04
Abdul Moin, Babita Rani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176504 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176504 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10342 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for respondents no.1 to 3.
2. No notice need be issued to the respondent no. 4 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.
3. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for quashing of the F.I.R. No. 0011 of 2024 under Sections 504 & 506 I.P.C and Section 66 C, 66 D of I.T. Act, Police Station Cyber Crime Police Thana, Amethi, District Amethi.
4. A perusal of the F.I.R. indicates that cognizable offence is made out.
5. Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Niharika Infrastructure Private Limited vs. State of Maharashtra : 2021 (19) SCC 401 has categorically held that it is only in cases where no cognizable offence or offence of any kind is disclosed in the first information report that the Court will not permit an investigation to go on.
6. As already indicated above, once a perusal of the FIR indicates cognizable offences are made out against the petitioner consequently there cannot be any occasion for interference in the F.I.R.
7. Considering the aforesaid, no case for interference is made out. The writ petition stands dismissed. November 4, 2025 Pachhere/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kailash Nath Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Amarjeet .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench