HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6962 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Sumit Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for respondents. 2. Present writ petition has been filed seeking direction to respondent no. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Sadar, District - Lucknow to decide representation of petitioner dated 11.11.2025, regarding entering name of petitioner in the revenue records. 3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that she has purchased a plot bearing Khata No. 00050, Gata No. 257, area 0.0205 hectares, situated in Village - Sikandarpur Khurd, Pargana & Tehsil - Sadar, District - Lucknow by means of registered sale deed dated 11.03.2024 from its erstwhile owner Ajay Yadav. 4. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after purchasing the aforesaid plot, the petitioner moved an application under Section 34/35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for mutation before the Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil - Sadar, District - Lucknow the case was registered as Case No. 14060 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. T 202410460214060) - Shivangi Tiwari Vs. Ajay Yadav, and the said application was allowed by means of order dated 13.07.2024. Subsequently, the file of the said case was forwarded to the Computer Cell at the office of Tehsildar for making necessary entries in the revenue records on 03.10.2024. It is submitted that when for a long time, no action was taken, petitioner moved representations before the authorities concerned, but till date no action has been taken. Hence present writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the State respondents to comply with the order dated 13.07.2024. 5. Learned Standing counsel, on the other hand, submits that the petitioner has equally efficacious and alternate remedy of executing the orders of revenue Courts as per Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual where an order of revenue authority can be executed. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sumit Kumar Pathak, Krishna Nand Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shivangi Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 6. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to approach the competent authority under Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual for execution of the orders passed by the Prescribed Authority as well as of the other authorities. 7. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach competent authority by moving appropriate application under para 460 of Revenue Court Manual to execute the orders of the revenue authorities. In case, such an application is moved within two weeks from today the same shall be disposed of expeditiously, in accordance with law. December 15, 2025 A. Verma A227 No. 6962 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench