Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1765 (BOM)

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (V.I.D.C.) MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, WASHIM v. KESHRABAI RAJARAM BANG (DEAD) THR. LRS. RUPCHAND S/O RAJARAM BANG AND ANOTHER

FA/1027/2017 · 2026-04-07

Shri Neeraj P Dhote

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 10.caf3794.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 3794 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1027 OF 2017 Executive Engineer, VIDC, Washim Vs. Rupchand s/o Rajaram Bang and anr. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mrs. Ujjwala A. Patil, Advocate for applicant. Mr. Amol Darekar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. S.C. Joshi, AGP for respondent No.2/State. CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE : 17.02.2025. First Appeal No.1027/2017 is came to be dismissed on account of failure to file private paper- book as directed by this Court. The appellant has preferred application for restoration of appeal being MCA (ST) No.3791/2025. However, there is a delay of 1215 days in filing the restoration application. Since the appeal is admitted and the first appeals of the year 2017 are still pending for final hearing, I am inclined to condone the delay caused in filing restoration application. Prity 2 / 2 10.caf3794.2025 Mics. Civil Application (ST) No.3791/2025 For the reasons above, First Appeal No.1027/2017 is restored to file, subject to condition that private paper-book will be filed by the appellant within a period of one week from today. Civil Application (CAF) No.3208/2024 The respondent No.1 is the land owner, has moved the present application seeking permission to withdraw the amount deposited by the appellant with this Court in compliance of condition imposed by this Court while granting stay to the execution of the impugned judgment and award passed by the learned reference Court. Since the enhancement is granted by the learned reference Court on the basis of a sale instance, the respondent No.1 is permitted to withdraw 75% of the amount deposited by the appellant with this Court along with accrued interest, 50% of the amount is permitted to be withdrawn on usual undertaking and balance 25% of the amount is permitted to be withdrawn on furnishing solvent security/surety. 2. The civil application is disposed of accordingly. (ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.) Prity Signed by: Mrs. Prity Gabhane Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 20/02/2025 18:03:03